Critique of Training
On the whole, I think the training was a positive experience. I'd like to separate this post on the basis of "pros", "cons", and "suggestions". ...more »
On the whole, I think the training was a positive experience. I'd like to separate this post on the basis of "pros", "cons", and "suggestions".
Pros:
-Round Robins allowed us to simulate cases - hands on work
-Learning how to write white papers was definitely helpful
-The order of topics (poverty, data collection, counseling, financial planning, & lastly, foreclosure) was well planned - I think it imitates our logical/emotional strategy as financial consultants -- We cannot help others as financial consultants if we do not understand the fundamentals of poverty & skills of counseling. Also, the data collection and financial planning tools will be implemented along the way.
-Sufficient time was given to "social time" - scavenger hunt, dinner on thursday
Cons:
-Round Robins did not focus on actual documentation and they only simulated first time meetings
-More time should be given to class performance of round robins - our "final" on Thursday could have been done Wednesday
Suggestions:
-More emphasis on documentation (going over the mortgages in order to spot out important info)
-Less reading, more in class practice (either push two reading days into a weekend to have 7 in-person training or reduce readings to 3 days)
-Round Robin: doing a session 1,2,3, etc. - actually developing a Loss Mitigation Package that includes a well developed plan of action (for example: if the choice of action is a loan modification in which a loan is reamortized (or change in interest rate or reducton of principal) - then actually go through the steps of calculating the new monthly payment) - Have trainees participate in a loss mitigation package as a consultant but also as a client
See you all thursday!
-Camille
« less full details »
Social Web